MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316663540 · doi:10.3390/en16021000

Optimal Management of a Virtual Power Plant Consisting of Renewable Energy Resources and Electric Vehicles Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming and Deep Learning

2023· article· en· W4316663540 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Ahmadian, K. Ponnambalam, Ali Almansoori, Ali Elkamel

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtual power plantComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Renewable energyDistributed generationEnergy managementDemand responseGridArtificial neural networkSmart gridElectricityDistributed computingAutomotive engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, renewable energy resources (RESs) and electric vehicles (EVs), in addition to other distributed energy resources (DERs), have gained high popularity in power systems applications. These resources bring quite a few advantages for power systems—reducing carbon emission, increasing efficiency, and reducing power loss. However, they also bring some disadvantages for the network because of their intermittent behavior and their high number in the grid which makes the optimal management of the system a tough task. Virtual power plants (VPPs) are introduced as a promising solution to make the most out of these resources by aggregating them as a single entity. On the other hand, VPP’s optimal management depends on its accuracy in modeling stochastic parameters in the VPP body. In this regard, an efficient approach for a VPP is a method that can overcome these intermittent resources. In this paper, a comprehensive study has been investigated for the optimal management of a VPP by modeling different resources—RESs, energy storages, EVs, and distributed generations. In addition, a method based on bi-directional long short-term memory networks is investigated for forecasting various stochastic parameters, wind speed, electricity price, load demand, and EVs’ behavior. The results of this study show the superiority of BLSTM methods for modeling these parameters with an error of 1.47% in comparison with real data. Furthermore, to show the performance of BLSTMs, its results are compared with other benchmark methods such as shallow neural networks, support vector machines, and long short-term memory networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207