MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316669723 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1090468

Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study

2023· article· en· W4316669723 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Di Matteo, Erica Moscioni, Maria Giovanna Lommano, Edoardo Cipolletta, Gianluca Smerilli, Sonia Farah, C. Airoldi, Sibel Zehra Aydın, Andrea Becciolini, Karina Rossi Bonfiglioli, Marina Carotti, Greta Carrara, Tomás Cazenave, Davide Corradini, Micaela Cosatti, Juan José de Agustín, Giulia Maria Destro Castaniti, Marco Di Carlo, Eleonora Di Donato, Luca Di Geso, Ashley Elliott, Daniela Fodor, Francesca Francioso, Alessandra Gabba, Cristina Hernández‐Díaz, Rudolf Horváth, Jana Hurňáková, Diogo Jesús, Josefina Marin, María Victoria Martiré, Riccardo Mashadi Mirza, Marco Massarotti, A Musca, Jagdish Nair, Tadashi Okano, Ioannis Papalopoulos, Javier Rosa, Marcos Rosemffet, João Rovisco, Davide Rozza, Fausto Salaffi, C. Scioscia, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Maria-Magdalena Tămaş, Shun Tanimura, Lucio Ventura‐Ríos, Catalina Villota‐Eraso, Orlando Villota, Paraskevi V. Voulgari, Florentin Ananu Vreju, Gentiana Vukatana, Johana Zacariaz Hereter, Anna Zanetti, Walter Grassi, Emilio Filippucci

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationEchogenicityMedicineKappaReliability (semiconductor)UltrasoundPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRadiologyPhysical therapyNuclear medicinePsychometricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients. Results: The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207