Greenhouse Climate Modeling Using Fuzzy Neural Network Machine Learning Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The greenhouse climate is a non-linear system that contains multiple inputs (predictors) and multiple outputs (responses). This project aimed to provide a solution, aided by artificial intelligence, to the issue of variations in time, input and output factors in a greenhouse internal climate that can adversely affect tomato seedlings. Machine learning Methodologies such as fuzzy inference and neural networks have been applied to mimic idealistic behavior. This paper proposes an adaptive system based on artificial neural networks technique embedded with fuzzy logic technique calls Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict air humidity, air temperature, internal radiation, and CO2 concentration while the seeds grow, in order to produce favorable greenhouse climate conditions. The input parameters include ten meteorological and control actuators that majorly influence tomato plants during their growth process in the greenhouse climate. This discussion revolves around a linguistic ANFIS model that will operate during the 48 days that it takes for the seedlings to grow. It will provide estimates of the greenhouse climate using meteorological data along with control actuators rooted in trained neural networks with back propagation optimization algorithm, and 500 iterations of the least square algorithm. Simulations have revealed the efficiency of this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".