MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317000347 · doi:10.1145/3573074.3573080

The Java Pathfinder Workshop 2022

2023· article· en· W4317000347 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Sherman, Yannic Noller, Cyrille Artho, Franck van Breugel, Anto Nanah Ji, John K. Kellerman, Parssa Khazra, Filip Kliber, Gaurang Kudale, Pavel Parízek, Corina S. Păsăreanu, Ron Pressler, Matt Walker, Hongru Wang, Qiuchen Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProgramming languageJavaBytecodeSymbolic executionJava bytecodeModel checkingProgram analysisJava Modeling LanguagePathfinderJava annotationSoftware engineeringSoftwareReal time JavaWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Java Pathfinder (JPF) was originally developed as an explicit state software model checker and subsequently evolved into an extensible Java bytecode analysis framework that has been successfully used to implement techniques such as symbolic and concolic execution, compositional verification, parallel execution, incremental program analysis, and many more. Apart from its original domain of concurrent Java programs, JPF now supports the verification of new domains such as UMLs, numeric programs, graphical user interfaces, and Android applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering NotesSame topicSoftware Reliability and Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207