MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317181623 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.p-0012

Does trajectory of ambient air pollutant (PM2.5, NO2) exposure influence cognitive function? A co-pollutant examination using sequence analysis

2022· article· en· W4317181623 on OpenAlexaff
Kristina Dang, Jennifer Weuve, M. Maria Glymour, Kevin Lane, Michael Bräuer, Mary N. Haan, Isabel Elaine Allen, Anusha M. Vable

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionAir pollutionDemographyRecallPercentileMedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthPsychologyStatisticsMathematicsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historical pattern of longitudinal changes in air pollution exposure may be relevant to cognitive risk in older adulthood. We used sequence analysis to characterize 10-year trajectories of PM2.5 and NO2 exposure and evaluate their association with cognition in a US-representative sample of 8,245 adults 65+ years old. The CACES database provided census tract mean annual PM2.5 and NO2 (trichotomized at 2010 25th and 75th percentiles [7.9 μg/m3; 10.8μg/m3 and 4.8 ppb; 10.8 ppb respectively]) from 2000-2010. Sequences of PM2.5 and NO2 were evaluated using the Halpin optimal matching algorithm. We linked exposure trajectory group to residential census tract (N=3,559) of each participant of NHATS. Participants underwent cognitive assessments annually; their episodic memory score in a given year was the mean of their immediate and delayed word recall scores, standardized to NHATS 2011 baseline mean and sd. We used linear mixed models to estimate the association of air pollution trajectory with memory, adjusted for age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, smoking status, neighborhood SES, and census division. Over 10 years, we observed 1,208 unique air pollution trajectories, which were clustered into 7 groups based on similarity. In general, participants occupying the higher exposure clusters had lower memory scores (e.g. high NO2 and PM2.5 until 2008, followed by medium level exposure by 2010 = -0.19; 95%CI: -0.29, -0.09). Through this novel application of sequence analysis, we identified 7 distinct air pollution trajectories. We found that participants’ historical pattern of air pollution exposure differentially predicted memory level such that, despite more recent lower exposures, higher exposures in the more distant past were associated with the greatest memory deficit . Our findings provide further support that use of more expansive air pollution exposure histories may offer more comprehensive discovery of air pollution’s adverse cognitive effects in older adulthood. sequence analysis, air pollution trajectories, longitudinal exposure assessment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207