MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduzione. I Critical Animal Studies incontrano gli studi teatrali e performativi

2022· book-chapter· it· W4317187331 on OpenAlex
Laura Budriesi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAccademia University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agli anni Settanta, in particolare al 1975, anno della pubblicazione di Animal Liberation di Peter Singer, si fa risalire l’inizio del movimento antispecista, che si oppone allo specismo ovvero alla discriminazione basata sull’appartenenza di specie. In realtà, come mostra il saggio Il caso del cane marrone (Mason 2021), all’inizio del Novecento in Inghilterra le lotte contro la vivisezione avevano già preso piede: due studentesse femministe svedesi che assistettero a una crudele tortura su u...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it