Development of new technological processes based on supersonic flow of natural gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of supersonic movement of natural gas in a pipeline and the possibility of developing new technological processes for cooling, drying and separating liquid hydrocarbons. Technological processes and a set of equipment created using the supersonic movement of natural gas are studied, their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. It is known that a change in the process of gas injection into UGS facilities in a wide range of pressure during the season creates opportunities for more efficient use of compressor equipment. The thermobaric parameters of gas cooling due to supersonic motion in various designs have been calculated, and the existence of ample opportunities for creating new technological processes has been proved. Recommendations have been developed on the throughput capacity of gas installations to ensure the regulation of cooling systems created for underground gas storage facilities. It was noted that the cooling and gas separation systems created on the basis of thermobaric parameters and principles of regulation will be useful not only for underground gas storages, but also for other sub-sectors of the gas industry. Keywords: natural gas; supersonic movement; laval nozzle; underground gas storage; gas cooling; separation; compressor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".