MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317211355 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550602

Optimization of Deep Reservoir Computing with Binary Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Time Horizon Forecasting of Power Consumption

2022· article· en· W4317211355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceBinary Independence ModelGenetic algorithmEnergy consumptionTime horizonArtificial neural networkMachine learningBall grid arrayBinary numberTime seriesAlgorithmMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The roll of consumption energy forecasting is very important to make planning of time-horizon strategy, and to mitigate a great energy management. As a result, improving the sustainability of energy, and creating a clean environment. Aiming to develop the forecasting of consumption energy in different time horizons, this work gives the results of a new hybrid method, which combine deep echo state network (DeepESN), with Binary genetic algorithm (BGA). DeepESN is an extension of Echo state network (ESN), which integrates the strong nonlinear time series processing capability (of ESN) with the advanced learning characteristic of the deep learning models. BGA is another version of genetic algorithm optimization methods that can be applied to find the best values of architecture hyperparameters of deep learning models, basesd on binary decoding of his chromosoms. In this work, we compared the accuracy and performance of proposed model DeepESN-BGA with other deep learning methods. It is found that DeepESN-BGA have a fast processing compared with other models. In addition, it gives best results based on error metrics, compared with DeepESN without BGA, and other deep learning models, in different time horizon forecasting. Proposed model has been compared also with DeepESN-DE, DeepESN-GA, and DeepESN-PSO aiming to evaluate the performance of BGA in term of deep learning optimization. DeepESN-BGA gives statistically good result compared with other hybrid models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it