MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317242210 · doi:10.1093/jge/gxac100

Gas hydrate reservoir identification based on rock physics modelling and sensitive elastic parameters

2023· article· en· W4317242210 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysics and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina National Petroleum CorporationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAuthigenicHydrateClathrate hydrateSaturation (graph theory)DeltaGeologyMineralogyChemistryPhysicsDiagenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Seismic bottom simulating reflections (BSR) analysis and seismic inversion are commonly used for gas hydrate reservoir interpretation. The relationship between gas hydrate saturation and elastic parameters can be influenced by gas hydrate occurrence state (e.g. pore-filling type gas hydrate or load-bearing type gas hydrate), and this may cause inaccurate interpretation. We first used the simplified three-phase Biot equation (STPBE) to model a formation containing two types of gas hydrate at the same time. Then the effects of occurrence state and authigenic minerals on the relationship between saturation and varied elastic parameters are analysed. Results show that bulk modulus (K), shear modulus ($\mu $), P-wave velocity (${V}_p$), S-wave velocity (${V}_s$), velocity ratio (${V}_p/{V}_s$), Poisson's ratio (v) and $\mu \rho $ increase at different rates with gas hydrate saturation, ${V}_p/{V}_s$ and v show relative higher sensitivity to occurrence state. Ratios of elastic parameter increments are further used to highlight the anomalies caused by gas hydrate. Four attributes ($\Delta K/\Delta \mu $, $\Delta {V}_p/\Delta {V}_s$, $\Delta ({V}_p/{V}_s)/\Delta \nu $ and $\Delta \lambda \rho /\Delta \mu \rho $) show good sensitivity to both gas hydrate saturation and occurrence state. $\Delta ({V}_p/{V}_s)/\Delta \nu $ and $\Delta \lambda \rho /\Delta \mu \rho $ can be used to distinguish gas hydrate with varied occurrence states from authigenic minerals (limestone, opal, pyrite and others). Two selected sensitive attributes $\Delta ({V}_p/{V}_s)/\Delta \nu $ and $\Delta \lambda \rho /\Delta \mu \rho $ are applied to well logs, four gas hydrate-bearing intervals in well 2L-38 from Mallik permafrost area in Canada and one gas hydrate-bearing interval in well A from Shenhu area in South China Sea are identified. These results are consistent with the interpreted result from the resistivity log using Archie's formula. This investigation may provide effective tools for the seismic interpretation of gas hydrate reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it