MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317355133 · doi:10.7494/manage.2022.23.1.7

Development of key performance indicators of capital market-oriented entities in the Prime Standard since the introduction of DRS 20

2023· article· en· W4317355133 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Blumenstein, Robert Schmidt, Jessica Hastenteufel

Bibliographic record

VenueManagerial Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicRisk Management in Financial Firms
Canadian institutionsInternational Air Transport Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformance indicatorPrime (order theory)Key (lock)Economic indicatorBusinessPoint (geometry)Capital (architecture)Computer scienceEconomicsMarketingMathematicsGeographyComputer securityMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the performance indicators of 168 Prime Standard entities since the introduction of DRS 20, focusing on the core question of how the use of performance indicators has changed over time. For this purpose, we compare the published key performance indicators from various companies in different years to point out existing differences. Furthermore, we examine which KPIs are changed most often and how frequently businesses adjust their performance indicators. The companies examined are differentiated according to size and sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagerial EconomicsSame topicRisk Management in Financial FirmsFrench-language works237,207