MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317358805 · doi:10.1007/s10840-023-01468-1

Incidence of premature battery depletion in subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients: insights from a multicenter registry

2023· article· en· W4317358805 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jakob Lüker, Marc Strik, Jason G. Andrade, Alexandre Raymond-Paquin, Mohamed ElRefai, Paul R. Roberts, Óscar Cano Pérez, Jordana Kron, Jayanthi N. Koneru, Hilton Franqui-Rivera, Arian Sultan, Angela Ernst, Jörn Schmitt, Alexander Pott, Christian Veltmann, Neil T. Srinivasan, Jason Collinson, Antonius van Stipdonk, Dominik Linz, Nina Fluschnik, Tobias Tönnis, Andreas Haeberlin, Sylvain Ploux, Daniel Steven

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversitätsklinikum KölnNovo Nordisk FondenUniversität zu Köln
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Battery (electricity)PediatricsImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous ICD established its role in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in recent years. The occurrence of premature battery depletion in a large subset of potentially affected devices has been a cause of concern. The incidence of premature battery depletion has not been studied systematically beyond manufacturer-reported data. METHODS: Retrospective data and the most recent follow-up data on S-ICD devices from fourteen centers in Europe, the US, and Canada was studied. The incidence of generator removal or failure was reported to investigate the incidence of premature S-ICD battery depletion, defined as battery failure within 60 months or less. RESULTS: Data from 1054 devices was analyzed. Premature battery depletion occurred in 3.5% of potentially affected devices over an observation period of 49 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of premature battery depletion of S-ICD potentially affected by a battery advisory was around 3.5% after 4 years in this study. Premature depletion occurred exclusively in devices under advisory. This is in line with the most recently published reports from the manufacturer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04767516 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interventional Cardiac ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207