MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4317381724 · doi:10.1101/2023.01.15.523513

Improved cognitive-motor processing speed and decreased functional connectivity after high intensity aerobic exercise in individuals with chronic stroke

2023· preprint· en· W4317381724 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin W. Andrushko, Shie Rinat, Brian Greeley, Beverley C. Larssen, Christina B. Jones, Cristina Rubino, Ronan Denyer, Jennifer K. Ferris, Kristin L. Campbell, Jason L. Neva, Lara A. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsAerobic exerciseCognitionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStroke (engine)PsychologyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceChronic strokePhysical therapyCognitive trainingMedicineRehabilitationNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After stroke, impaired motor performance is linked to an increased demand for cognitive resources. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive function in healthy populations and may be effective in altering cognitive function post-stroke. We sought to determine if high intensity aerobic exercise paired with motor training in individuals with chronic stroke alters cognitive-motor function and functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a key region for cognitive-motor processes, and the sensorimotor network. Twenty-five participants with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to exercise (n = 14; 66 ± 11 years; 4 females), or control (n = 11; 68 ± 8 years; 2 females) groups. Both groups performed five-days of paretic upper limb motor training after either high intensity aerobic exercise (3 intervals of 3 minutes each, total exercise duration of 23-minutes) or watching a documentary (control). Resting-state fMRI, and TMT-A and B were recorded pre- and post-intervention. Both groups showed implicit motor sequence learning ( p < .001), but there was no added benefit of exercise ( p = .738). Regardless of group, the changes in task score ( p = .025), and dwell time ( p = .043) were correlated with a decrease in DLPFC-sensorimotor network functional connectivity ( p = .024), which is thought to reflect a reduction in the cognitive demand and increased automaticity. The exercise group experienced greater overall cognitive-motor improvements measured with the trail making test part A (TMT-A: task score: p = .012; dwell time: p = .024; movement time: p = .567). Aerobic exercise may improve cognitive-motor processing speed post-stroke. Significance statement After stroke, impaired motor performance is linked to an increased demand for cognitive resources. In our work we show that high intensity aerobic exercise paired with an implicit motor learning task improves cognitive-motor processing speed and reduces resting-state functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the sensorimotor network in individuals living with chronic stroke. These data likely reflect a reduction in cognitive resource dependence during a cognitive-motor task after stroke and a shift towards cognitive-motor automaticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→