Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this digital era, an increasing number of semiconductor manufacturing companies have developed thinner and cheaper circuit components, such as diodes, MOSFETs, and FinFETs. At the same time, gate stack technology is also introduced in MOSFETs to help solve the problem posed by short channel effects. There are a large number of researches on different MOSFETs using gate stack technology, therefore, this paper is a literature review of three different kinds of gate stacked MOSFETs and their behavior against short channel effects. The MOSFETs discussed in this paper are investigated in 2017, 2018 and 2020, and the ability of weakening short channel effects is also analyzed. Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), threshold voltage roll-off, and subthreshold swing are three common short channel effects, and though the improvement in gate stack technology, they are suppressed in some degree. Gate stack technology has been developing new possibilities and it is expected that gate stack MOSFETs are much more powerful in confronting short channel effects and they will play a key role in different fields in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".