MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FEIF: Feature Excitation and Interactive Fusion for 6D Object Pose Estimation

2022· article· en· W4317383363 on OpenAlexaff
Qiwei Meng, Shiqiang Zhu, Jianjun Gu, Zheyuan Lin, Ling Zhong, Wei Song

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)PoseArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionRGB color model3D pose estimationRobotFusion mechanismComputationFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)FusionAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present FEIF, a novel framework for 6D object pose estimation from a single RGBD image. Compared with previous approaches, this model fully leverages the complementary RGB and depth information through lay-erwise feature excitation and interactive fusion, thus improving the effectiveness and robustness of extracted features. The representative RGBD features can be subsequently applied for object keypoints prediction and pose computation. In addition, our FEIF includes a self-evaluation module to make robots aware of the confidence of pose estimation, so they are flexible to take the corresponding strategy for following tasks. Experiment results prove the SOTA performance of our model on LineMOD, Occlusion-LineMOD and YCB-Video datasets, and we also demonstrate its applicability and robustness in real-world robotic manipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207