MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317396153 · doi:10.14740/jmc4024

Breast to Brain: A Case Report and Literature Review of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

2023· article· en· W4317396153 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Henrik Ghantarchyan, Suyee Win, Essam K. Nagori, Sarkis Arabian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArrowhead Regional Medical Center
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerMeningeal carcinomatosisLumbar punctureCarcinosisLeptomeningesCancerRadiologySurgeryPathologyCerebrospinal fluidInternal medicineCentral nervous systemPeritoneal carcinomatosisColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is widely known as the most common cancer in women in the United States. If left untreated, it can have detrimental effects. If the breast cancer is aggressive in nature, it can metastasize to the lymph nodes, bones, liver, lungs, and brain. A rare location of metastasis is the leptomeninges, specifically the pia and arachnoid matter. This term is coined as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Its diagnosis can be challenging to make as patients can present with non-specific symptoms. We present the case of an elderly female with a prior history of breast cancer that was treated with 12 cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel, radiation to her left axilla, and daily anastrozole for 3 years who came into the emergency department for worsening confusion, urinary incontinence, and difficulty ambulating. Cerebral spinal fluid obtained from a lumbar puncture supported a diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207