MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317436736 · doi:10.3390/rs15030590

GloWS-Net: A Deep Learning Framework for Retrieving Global Sea Surface Wind Speed Using Spaceborne GNSS-R Data

2023· article· en· W4317436736 on OpenAlexaff
Jinwei Bu, Kegen Yu, Xiaoqing Zuo, Jun Ni, Yongfa Li, Weimin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGNSS applicationsRemote sensingWind speedGround truthSea stateComputer scienceSea-surface heightEnvironmental scienceMeteorologySatelliteMean squared errorGeologyGlobal Positioning SystemArtificial intelligenceAltimeterGeographyTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) is a new remote sensing technology that uses GNSS signals reflected from the Earth’s surface to estimate geophysical parameters. Because of its unique advantages such as high temporal and spatial resolutions, low observation cost, wide coverage and all-weather operation, it has been widely used in land and ocean remote sensing fields. Ocean wind monitoring is the main objective of the recently launched Cyclone GNSS (CYGNSS). In previous studies, wind speed was usually retrieved using features extracted from delay-Doppler maps (DDMs) and empirical geophysical model functions (GMFs). However, it is a challenge to employ the GMF method if using multiple sea state parameters as model input. Therefore, in this article, we propose an improved deep learning network framework to retrieve global sea surface wind speed using spaceborne GNSS-R data, named GloWS-Net. GloWS-Net considers the fusion of auxiliary information including ocean swell significant wave height (SWH), sea surface rainfall and wave direction to build an end-to-end wind speed retrieval model. In order to verify the improvement of the proposed model, ERA5 and Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) wind data were used as reference for extensive testing to evaluate the wind speed retrieval performance of the GloWS-Net model and previous models (i.e., GMF, fully connected network (FCN) and convolutional neural network (CNN)). The results show that, when using ERA5 winds as ground truth, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the proposed GloWS-Net model is 23.98% better than that of the MVE method. Although the GloWS-Net model and the FCN model have similar RMSE (1.92 m/s), the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the former is improved by 16.56%; when using CCMP winds as ground truth, the RMSE of the proposed GloWS-Net model is 2.16 m/s, which is 20.27% better than the MVE method. Compared with the FCN model, the MAPE is improved by 17.75%. Meanwhile, the GloWS-Net outperforms the FCN, traditional CNN, modified CNN (MCNN) and CyGNSSnet models in global wind speed retrieval especially at high wind speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207