MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317486889 · doi:10.3917/rai.088.0045

L’État civil : réflexion autour de la pensée de Muḥammad ‘Abduh

2023· article· fr· W4317486889 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Amine Brahimi, Youssouf T. Sangaré

Bibliographic record

VenueRaisons politiques · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Depuis plus d’une décennie, la notion d’État civil (dawla madaniyya) se trouve, de plus en plus, mobilisée dans les débats et tensions qui traversent les mondes arabes. Ainsi, elle a été largement utilisée et scandée en 2011, lors du « printemps arabe » et des débats constitutionnels qui ont suivi la révolution tunisienne, mais aussi dans des révoltes plus récentes (Hirak algérien, Révolution soudanaise). Dans cet article, nous nous proposons de procéder à un retour historique sur cette notion d’État civil ; ce qui permettra de mieux comprendre les modalités de son émergence dans la pensée arabo-musulmane ainsi que les problématiques qui y sont liées. Pour ce faire, nous nous appuyons sur les écrits d’une des figures les plus importantes de cette pensée : Muḥammad ‘Abduh (1849-1905).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRaisons politiquesSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207