MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317496750 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3238058

GMCNet: A Generative Multi-Resolution Framework for Cardiac Registration

2023· article· en· W4317496750 on OpenAlexaff
Ameneh Sheikhjafari, Michelle Noga, Ahmed Ahmed, Nilanjan Ray, Kumaradevan Punithakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage registrationRobustness (evolution)Mutual informationPairwise comparisonConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Generative modelComputer visionDeep learningMetric (unit)Artificial neural networkGenerative grammarImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deformable image registration plays a crucial role in estimating cardiac deformation from a sequence of images. However, existing registration methods primarily process images as pairs instead of processing all images in a sequence together. This study proposes a novel end-to-end learning-free generative multi-resolution convolutional neural network (GMCNet) with the primary focus of registering images in a sequence. Even though learning-based methods have yielded high performance for image registration, their performance depends on their ability to learn information from a large number of samples which are difficult to obtain and might bias the framework to the specific domain of data. The proposed learning-free method eliminates the need for a dedicated training set while exploiting the capabilities of neural networks to achieve accurate deformation fields. Due to its capability of parameter sharing through the architecture, the GMCNet can be used as a groupwise registration as well as pairwise registration. The proposed method was evaluated on three different clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging datasets and compared quantitatively against nine other state-of-the-art learning and optimization-based algorithms. The proposed method outperformed other methods in all comparisons and yielded average Dice metric values ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 for the datasets. Different aspects of the GMCNet are also explored by assessing 1) the robustness; 2) performance on pairwise registration; 3) the influence of spatial transformation in a controlled environment; and 4) the impact of different multi-resolution structures. The results demonstrate that using temporal information to estimate the deformation fields leads to more accurate registration results and improved robustness under different noise levels. Moreover, the proposed method does not need images for training, and therefore, its prediction is not domain-specific and can be applied to any sequence of images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207