La dignité de la créature au miroir de l’animal. Droit fondamental ou principe général ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La dignité de la créature est un concept juridique flou, mais non pas vide. Elle fixe un programme ambitieux : le respect du vivant par une communauté humaine et une responsabilité à son égard. Malgré ses 30 ans, cette innovation du droit helvétique est encore en quête d’une concrétisation juridique. Afin d’envisager plus précisément les formes que cette dignité du vivant pourrait prendre à l’avenir, il est utile de lui tendre un miroir grossissant : celui de l’animal. C’est en effet sous la guise de la dignité animale que se laissent aujourd’hui le mieux percevoir les deux voies possibles de la concrétisation de ce concept innovant (droit subjectif ou principe). L’alternative mérite qu’on s’y arrête, car elle trace sans doute les contours de la société multispécifique de demain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".