MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317506376 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550615

Power Control Approach for PV Panel System Based on PSO and INC Optimization Algorithms

2022· article· en· W4317506376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saadi I. Saadi, Ibrahim K. Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power point trackingParticle swarm optimizationConvertersMaximum power principleMATLABControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)VoltageComputer scienceTransient (computer programming)EngineeringElectronic engineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineeringInverterControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this paper is to obtain optimum power from a Photovoltaic (PV) panel and deliver it to a load system under standard irradiance and temperature weather conditions. Standard Boost DC-DC converters and bidirectional Buck-Boost DC-DC converters work as voltage controlling units for the power provided from the PV panel, which is used to charge the battery and supply suitable voltage signal to AC load. MPPT technique, based on two control algorithms, Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Incremental Conductance (INC), is used to extract maximum power from the solar cells. Matlab/ Simulink environment is adopted to simulate the proposed PV power system. Simulation results are presented and analyzed based on transient and steady-state performance parameters. The performance results of the PV array system under the Standard Test Conditions (STC) showed that the INC-MPPT control algorithm can provide a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207