MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317511312 · doi:10.2196/preprints.45743

The fastest IRONMAN® race courses for age group triathletes are in the United States of America - an internet-based cross-sectional study using a machine learning approach with more than 670'000 race records (Preprint)

2023· preprint· en· W4317511312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beat Knechtle, Mabliny Thuany, David Valero, Elias Villiger, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Ivan Čuk, Katja Weiss

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesDemographyRecreationGeographyMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND The majority of participants in IRONMAN® triathlon races are age group athletes. We have extensive knowledge about recreational athletes' training and competition participation. Nonetheless, age group athletes have to achieve fast race times to qualify for the IRONMAN® World Championship in ‘IRONMAN® Hawaii’. They would therefore benefit from knowing where the fastest IRONMAN® race courses in the world are. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate where in the world the fastest IRONMAN® race courses for age group triathletes are. METHODS Data from 677,702 IRONMAN® age group finishers´ records (544,963 males and 132,739 females) from 228 countries participating in 67 different IRONMAN® event locations between 2002 and 2022 were analyzed. Data were analyzed using different machine learning (ML) regression models. Five different algorithms (Random Forest Regressor, XG Boost Regressor, Ada Boost Regressor, Cat Boot Regressor, and Decision Tree Regressor) were used. The models' used gender, country of origin, and event location as independent variables to predict the final race time. RESULTS Most of the successful IRONMAN® age group triathletes originated from the United States of America (USA) (274,553), followed by athletes from the United Kingdom (55,410) and Canada (38,264). Most of the athletes competed in Ironman® Wisconsin (38,545), followed by Ironman® Florida (38,157) and Ironman® Lake Placid (34,341). All five predictive models identified the ‘country’ as the most important predictor variable. A decision tree algorithm, trained with data from 2002 - 2022, forecasts that the best IRONMAN® age group finish times will be around 11:14:33 (h:min:s) and will be achieved by males in age groups 45 years or younger, not from the USA, the United Kingdom and Canada, and competing in IRONMAN® Wisconsin, Florida, Lake Placid, Arizona, Hawaii, or Austria. CONCLUSIONS The fastest race courses for age group IRONMAN® triathletes are in the USA (e.g., IRONMAN® Wisconsin, Florida, Lake Placid, Arizona, and Hawaii). However, the fastest IRONMAN® age group triathletes do not originate from the USA but from Australia, Germany, France, Spain, Sweden, Brazil, or Austria. Any IRONMAN® age group triathlete intending to achieve a fast IRONMAN® race time should consider participating in an IRONMAN® race held in the USA. CLINICALTRIAL -

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics and Physical PerformanceFrench-language works237,207