MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317515526 · doi:10.1109/tap.2023.3236779

Planar Array of UWB Active Slot Antennas for Microwave Imaging of the Breast

2023· article· en· W4317515526 on OpenAlexafffund
Nooshin Valizade Shahmirzadi, Vartika Tyagi, Jimmy Nguyen, Romina Kazemivala, Natalia K. Nikolova, Chih‐Hung Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcMaster University
KeywordsGround planePlanar arrayShielded cableAntenna arrayAntenna (radio)AmplifierPlanarSlot antennaComputer scienceOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsDipole antennaAcousticsTelecommunicationsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A shielded planar array of active slot antennas is proposed for applications in the microwave imaging of the breast. The frequency band is from 3 to 8 GHz, where reflection loss better than 10 dB and interelement mutual coupling less than −20 dB are achieved. The center-to-center element spacing is 12$\times12$mm. A low-noise amplifier (LNA) is integrated with each antenna element for use in a receiving configuration. A ground plane within the multilayer design separates the antenna array from the electronics array while providing shielding from the back and improving the power coupling into the tissue. The proposed structure resolves an outstanding problem in the design of large shielded antenna arrays for tissue imaging, namely, the interconnects between the array elements and the electronic circuits, which are separated by multiple dielectric layers and a grounded plane. The critical development is the new low-reflection triple-wire vertical transition that carries the signal from the antenna layer to the electronics layer while traversing through multiple layers of different permittivities and through openings in the ground plane. The design is verified by simulations and measurements. The passive and active designs are compared, illustrating the full utilization of the LNA gain. The performance of the proposed active array is also examined in imaging experiments with a compressed-breast phantom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207