Benthic Invertebrates on the Move: A Tale of Ocean Warming and Sediment Carbon Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ongoing effects of climate change create a dual challenge of shifting distributions of organisms and concerns about the fate of organic carbon in nature. Marine sediments store vast amounts of organic carbon, but the fate of that material hinges on the biology of organisms associated with the seafloor and how they influence rates of carbon decomposition and burial. Shifts in large megafauna that disturb and thus help to oxygenate sediments could have important ramifications regarding whether sediments release or store carbon for long periods of time. We consider snow crab and lobster, two commercially important seafloor species in the Northeastern Atlantic, and the potential effects of ongoing changes in their distributions and that of their fisheries for future climate scenarios. These ongoing biogeographic shifts, considered in tandem with areas of seabed legislatively protected from fishing impacts and thus not confounded by cumulative effects of fishing gear disturbance, offer an opportunity to study how newly arrived species that disturb large areas of the seafloor might influence the global carbon cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".