MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317532927 · doi:10.2217/fca-2022-0107

Anomalous Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Arising From the Right Coronary Artery: A Case Report

2023· article· en· W4317532927 on OpenAlexaff
Ryaan EL‐Andari, Qunjun Duan, Angela Neufeld, Jayan Nagendran

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRight coronary arteryCardiologyCircumflexInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCoronary sinusArteryBypass graftingCoronary anatomyCoronary artery diseaseCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital anomalous coronary artery origins are rare, with a prevalence of 0.24-1.6%. Common configurations include left circumflex arising from the right coronary (RCA), left main coronary arising from the right coronary sinus and independent ostia for the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex. One rare configuration that is not well described is the LAD arising from the RCA. A 68-year-old patient presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and was found to have a patent LAD arising from the RCA. In patients presenting with coronary artery disease and anomalous coronary anatomy, careful preoperative planning and intraoperative attention to patient anatomy is essential in identifying high-risk coronary anomalies and providing the correct and optimal treatments for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture CardiologySame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207