MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317566926 · doi:10.21105/joss.03736

PIVC: A C/C++ Program for Particle Image VelocimetryVector Computation

2023· article· en· W4317566926 on OpenAlexafffund
Kadeem Dennis, Michael Marxen, Kamran Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsParticle image velocimetryParticle tracking velocimetryComputationComputer scienceVelocimetryComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligencePhysicsAlgorithmOpticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluid dynamics is an extremely broad area of study where the motion of fluids is investigated and characterized across a wide range of length and time scales.In a majority of practical applications, fluid flow is turbulent in nature, a condition where the fluid motion is highly three-dimensional and stochastic.While the Navier-Stokes equations (governing equations in fluid mechanics) are applicable to all fluid flows, determining a general solution for these equations for turbulent flows is computationally challenging and mathematically impossible.Hence, experimental research is a leading contributor to the advancement of knowledge on fluid dynamics.Experimental research is heavily reliant on the tools and techniques of performing measurements of fluid phenomena.Fluid velocity is one of the fundamental variables and a parameter of interest in fluid mechanics.Hence, knowing the fluid velocity field in time and/or space is often the primary objective in fluid dynamics research.Thus, most of the tools and techniques used in experimental fluid mechanics research are used to measure the fluid velocity in a given flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207