A Conceptual Sizing Tool for Regional and Commuter Aircraft with Hybrid-Electric Propulsion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0213.vid The rapidly growing aviation industry aims to reduce its carbon footprint drastically in the upcoming years. Therefore, there is a need for environmentally friendly aircraft that integrate new configurations and technologies, such as hybrid-electric, distributed-electric, and all-electric propulsion. New conceptual design tools need to be put in place to analyze the potential benefits of these new configurations and technologies. The hybrid-electric sizing tool described in this paper is developed with the objective of evaluating a potential reduction of fuel burn by estimating the fuel mass, battery mass, and overall mass for a given mission profile and level of hybridization and is based on a series of top-level requirements, flight segments' constraints, and aircraft characteristics. The proposed method implements performance constraints for Part 23 and Part 25 certified aircraft, as much promise is seen in the hybridization of regional or commuter aircraft. The validation of the tool focuses particularly on this segment of aircraft. In addition, this paper includes a comparison with other hybrid-aircraft sizing tools in the literature. Overall, this tool, integrated into a multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization framework, enables performing system integration studies for hybrid-electric aircraft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it