Fully Discrete Entropy-Stable Flux Reconstruction Scheme for Compressible Flows through the Relaxation Runge-Kutta Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0663.vid Entropy-stable methods are able to improve stability and accuracy of high-fidelity flow simulations in aerodynamics problems by adding the minimum amount of dissipation for nonlinear stability. Discontinuous Galerkin and flux reconstruction methods have been used in split forms to achieve semi-discrete entropy stability. We use the relaxation Runge-Kutta (RRK) method in conjunction with a split-form flux reconstruction scheme to construct a robust, fully-discrete entropy conserving scheme. The fully-discrete scheme ensures stability properties are retained when using relatively large timestep size, while adding only an algebraic equation. We demonstrate the properties of the fully-discrete scheme using entropy-conservative problems with the Burgers' and Euler equations. The fully-discrete entropy-conserving scheme is able to conserve entropy to machine precision in all test cases, while maintaining the expected orders of convergence of the semi-discrete scheme. We hope to apply the entropy-stable scheme presented in this conference proceeding to viscous, industrially-relevant cases, and thoroughly explore an entropy-stable version of the fully-discrete scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it