Fet-Net Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Fetal Orientation in Fetal MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying fetal orientation is essential for determining the mode of delivery and for sequence planning in fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This manuscript describes a deep learning algorithm named Fet-Net, composed of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which allows for the automatic detection of fetal orientation from a two-dimensional (2D) MRI slice. The architecture consists of four convolutional layers, which feed into a simple artificial neural network. Compared with eleven other prominent CNNs (different versions of ResNet, VGG, Xception, and Inception), Fet-Net has fewer architectural layers and parameters. From 144 3D MRI datasets indicative of vertex, breech, oblique and transverse fetal orientations, 6120 2D MRI slices were extracted to train, validate and test Fet-Net. Despite its simpler architecture, Fet-Net demonstrated an average accuracy and F1 score of 97.68% and a loss of 0.06828 on the 6120 2D MRI slices during a 5-fold cross-validation experiment. This architecture outperformed all eleven prominent architectures (p < 0.05). An ablation study proved each component’s statistical significance and contribution to Fet-Net’s performance. Fet-Net demonstrated robustness in classification accuracy even when noise was introduced to the images, outperforming eight of the 11 prominent architectures. Fet-Net’s ability to automatically detect fetal orientation can profoundly decrease the time required for fetal MRI acquisition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".