MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317607745 · doi:10.29390/cjrt-2022-037

The safety of immediate extubation, and factors associated with delayed extubation, in cardiac surgical patients receiving fast-track cardiac anesthesia: An integrative review

2023· review· en· W4317607745 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Raluca Tiganila, Carolyn McCoy, Robert Gilbert, James Raco

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyCINAHLCardiac surgeryCochrane LibraryPerioperativeRandomized controlled trialAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineSurgeryInternal medicinePsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early extubation (EE), within 8 h of cardiac surgery, is associated with improved resource utilization. Studies have demonstrated that for patients receiving low-dose, fast-track opioid cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) protocols, EE is as safe as conventional care. To date, it is unclear when the earliest timepoints for safe extubation might be. Additionally, some authors pointed out that certain patients receiving FTCA protocols frequently experience delays during extubation attempts. Understanding the factors associated with delayed extubation is crucial for perioperative planning and resource management. This review seeks to 1) determine whether immediate extubation (IE) in the operating room is as safe as EE and 2) identify factors associated with delayed extubation. Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CINAHL (up to March 2022) were searched. Studies pertaining to FTCA, IE, EE or factors associated with delayed extubation were included. All authors extracted, appraised and synthesized data. The primary outcome measures were treatment results and factors associated with delayed extubation. Results: Six studies investigated treatment outcomes associated with FTCA and IE. One randomized controlled trial reported that outcomes associated with IE were comparable to those with EE. Five observational studies reported incidence for 19 treatment outcomes associated with IE, but no comparisons were made to EE. Six observational studies assessed pre- and intraoperative factors associated with delayed extubation in FTCA patients. In at least one study, 37 factors were investigated and 22 were identified. The most frequently reported factors were pre-existing cardiac insufficiency or renal disease, time on pump and cross-clamp time. Obesity and stroke were investigated but were not associated with delayed extubation. No study examined the influence of race, ethnicity or gender on outcomes. Discussion and conclusion: Evidence pertaining to treatment outcomes associated with FTCA and IE is weak. Observational studies cannot determine causation. Large multicentre randomized control trials are required to determine the safety of IE. Although numerous factors have been associated with delayed extubation, several studies do not describe how or which factors were selected for examination. Therefore, certain factors may have yet to be evaluated. Future studies should comprehensively define all factors under investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory TherapySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207