Uncovering hidden biological processes by probabilistic filtering of single-cell data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Elucidating underlying biological processes in single-cell data is an ongoing challenge and the number of methods that recapitulate dominant signals in such data has increased significantly. However, cellular populations encode multiple biological attributes, related to their spatial configuration, temporal trajectories, cell-cell interactions, and responses to environmental cues, which may be overshadowed by the dominant signal and thus much harder to recover. To approach this task, we developed SiFT (SIgnal FilTering), a method for filtering biological signals in single-cell data, thus uncovering underlying processes of interest. Utilizing existing prior knowledge and reconstruction tools for a specific biological signal, such as spatial structure, SiFT filters the signal and uncovers additional biological attributes. SiFT is applicable to a wide range of tasks, from the removal of unwanted variation in the data as a pre-processing step to revealing hidden biological structures. Applied for pre-processing, SiFT outperforms state-of-the-art methods for the removal of nuisance signals and cell cycle effects. To recover underlying biological structure, we use existing prior knowledge regarding liver zonation to filter the spatial signal from single-cell liver data thereby enhancing the temporal circadian signal the cells are encoding. Lastly, we showcase the applicability of SiFT in the case-control setting for studying COVID-19 disease. Filtering the healthy signal , based on reference samples from healthy donors, exposes disease-related dynamics in COVID-19 data and highlights disease informative cells and their underlying disease response pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".