Genetic Profiling in Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery

imaging: imagingNew research finds that patients with invasive breast cancer who scored low on investigational gene molecular signatures had comparable rates of local recurrence regardless of whether they received adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Presenting their findings at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, researchers detailed how these results suggest that genetic profiling may help identify breast cancer patients who can safely omit radiation therapy after undergoing breast-conserving surgery (Abstract GS4-03). Patients who undergo breast-conserving surgery are typically recommended to receive adjuvant radiation therapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, many of these patients will not experience a local recurrence even without radiation therapy, the authors noted, adding there are currently no reliable predictive classifiers to identify patients who might be able to skip radiation therapy. Also, the link between radiation therapy and problematic side effects in some patients underscores the importance of identifying those patients who can safely bypass radiation therapy. Study Details For this study, a team led by Per Karlsson, MD, Professor of Oncology at the Sahlgrenska Comprehensive Cancer Center and the University of Gothenburg, evaluated the predictive potential of POLAR (Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy). It is an investigational 16-gene molecular signature that was developed based on gene expression differences between patients with and without local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Genes included in the signature have known roles in cellular proliferation and the immune response.Per Karlsson, MD: Per Karlsson, MDKarlsson and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of 623 patients with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who were enrolled in one of three randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of breast-conserving surgery with and without local breast radiation therapy. The clinical trials included in the meta-analysis were the Swedish SweBCG91RT trial, the Scottish Conservation Trial, and a trial from the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) in Canada. Among the 623 patients taking part in the meta-analysis, 354 were from SweBCG91RT and 132 came from the PMH trial. To evaluate the predictive capability of POLAR, the researchers analyzed gene expression in patient breast tumor samples to assign each patient a POLAR score. They then examined the impact of radiation therapy on patients with high and low POLAR scores. Among the 429 patients with high POLAR scores, those who received adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery had a 63 percent reduction of local recurrence compared with those who did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy, suggesting that adjuvant radiation therapy was beneficial for these patients. Among the 194 patients with low POLAR scores, there was no significant difference in local recurrence rate between those who received adjuvant radiation therapy and those who did not. After 10 years, 5 percent of patients who received radiation therapy experienced a local recurrence compared with 7 percent of those who did not receive radiation therapy. In this patient-level meta-analysis of three independent randomized clinical trials, the POLAR gene profile successfully predicted which patients would and would not benefit from local radiation therapy, thereby identifying a group of breast cancer patients for whom radiation therapy may be safely omitted after breast-conserving surgery, according to the authors. Noting that the POLAR gene profile may help mitigate toxicities and improve quality of life for many breast cancer patients, the researchers add that the POLAR gene profile will need further validation and additional streamlining before it could be used in a clinical setting. Karlsson and colleagues plan to undertake additional research to examine whether the POLAR gene profile can also identify patients who could safely avoid regional radiation therapy, which is associated with more severe toxicities than local radiation therapy. “Breast cancer is commonly classified by immunohistochemistry in different approximated sub-types. This classification is good,” Karlsson told Oncology Times. “However, gene expression information can give a more diverse information of the tumor. Out of the diverse information of all expressed genes we have identified a 16-gene profile (POLAR) with capacity to prognosticate locoregional recurrences and to predict radiotherapy benefit. The gene expression contains much more info than just immunohistochemistry, which we used in the development of the POLAR score.” In terms of what these findings signify for the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer patients for whom adjuvant radiation therapy is recommended, “we need further streamlining of the POLAR assay and some further validation before it can be used in the clinic,” Karlsson noted. “Going forward, our results indicate that, in 25 percent of the patients in this population, radiotherapy can be safely omitted.” Mark McGraw is a contributing writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.