MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317625873 · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.1099162

Scientists warning on the ecological effects of radioactive leaks on ecosystems

2023· article· en· W4317625873 on OpenAlexaff
Cristián Bonacic, Rodrigo A. Medellín, William J. Ripple, Raman Sukumar, André Ganswindt, Suzana M. Padua, Claudio Padua, Mary C. Pearl, Luis F. Aguirre, Lourdes Mugica Valdés, Damayanti Buchori, John L. Innes, José Tomás Ibarra, Ricardo Rozzi, A. Alonso Aguirre

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
KeywordsBiosphereEcosystemAnthropoceneEcologyAstrobiologyClimate changeAdaptation (eye)Environmental scienceWarning systemTerrestrial ecosystemEnvironmental resource managementBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nuclear leakage or tactical nuclear weapon use in a limited war could cause immense and long-lasting ecological consequences beyond the direct site of exposure. We call upon all scientists to communicate the importance of the environmental impacts of such an event to all life forms on Earth, including humankind. Changes to ecosystem structure and functioning and species extinctions would alter the biosphere for an unknown time frame. Radiation could trigger cascade effects in marine, atmospheric and terrestrial ecosystems of a magnitude far beyond human capabilities for mitigation or adaptation. Even a “tactical nuclear war” could alter planet Earth’s living boundaries, ending the current Anthropocene era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesFrench-language works237,207