MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317632928 · doi:10.2514/6.2023-1583

A Pareto Multi-Objective Optimization of a Camber Morphing Airfoil using Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm

2023· article· en· W4317632928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirfoilAerodynamicsAngle of attackLift-to-drag ratioGenetic algorithmComputer scienceCamber (aerodynamics)Multi-objective optimizationStall (fluid mechanics)AlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-1583.vid This study uses a multi-objective Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm to optimise the aerodynamics of a well-known UAV, the UAS-S45. The optimization algorithm is combined with updated Class Shape Transformation (CST) parameterization to improve aerodynamic performance by increasing lift-to-drag ratio and aerodynamic endurance at various angles of attack. The reference airfoil is parameterized using the CST to give local shape changes and skin flexibility for optimum morphing airfoil combinations. The optimization scheme was carried out with an in-house MATLAB code and this procedure is based on a multi-objective Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm coupled to XFoil solver, and validation is done using the SST-K Omega model. The results of the optimizations carried out using different operating conditions are presented; starting from the optimal Pareto fronts, several solutions are selected and compared in terms of airfoil shapes and performance. The results show that the morphing improves the UAS-S45 airfoil's aerodynamic efficiency. The improved airfoils have shown a high improvement in overall aerodynamic performance by up to 65.3% in lift to drag ratio at 8 degrees angle of attack compared to the reference airfoil, and an increase in C_L^(3/2)/C_D of up to 98.8% at 8 degrees for the UAS-S45 optimized airfoil configurations. The optimization increases the overall aerodynamic performance of the configuration and the stall angle from 12º to at least 16º. The method used in this work can be employed as a valuable tool for replacing the traditional slats and flaps at the leading edge and the trailing edge of the airfoil. The pareto optimization analysis will be presented with the optimization results and numerical analysis using high fidelity CFD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it