MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317633806 · doi:10.2514/6.2023-2094

Modeling of a Wind-Turbine-Powered Ground Vehicle

2023· article· en· W4317633806 on OpenAlexaff
Meyer Nahon, Zihao Zhuo, Shengan Yang, Inna Sharf, Rick Cavallaro, Stephen Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerationTurbineMarine engineeringWind speedDragAutomotive engineeringSensitivity (control systems)AerodynamicsEngineeringComputer scienceSimulationAerospace engineeringMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-2094.vid A number of vehicles have been demonstrated in past years that are purely wind-powered and capable of propelling themselves upwind into an oncoming wind. A wind turbine mounted on the vehicle drives the wheels of the vehicle through a geartrain. To help understand the vehicle operation, this paper presents a dynamics model of such a vehicle, using a blade-element momentum theory model of the turbine. As a case study, we use the Blackbird vehicle which set an upwind speed record in 2012. The model is able to accurately predict the vehicle performance in upwind mode when compared to available experimental data. Once validated, the model is used to determine how the Blackbird could be refined to improve its performance. In particular, we find that a variable-ratio transmission could substantially improve the vehicle’s acceleration; and that using lower gear ratios would slightly improve its terminal velocity. A sensitivity analysis performed on the losses (rolling resistance, air drag and transmission efficiency) found that improvement in the transmission efficiency would lead to the greatest increase in terminal velocity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA SCITECH 2023 ForumSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207