A Novel Air Traffic Management and Control Methodology using Fault-Tolerant Autoencoder and P2P Blockchain Application on the UAS-S4 Ehécatl
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-2190.vid This paper presents a methodology for designing a highly reliable Air Traffic Management and Control (ATMC) methodology using Neural Networks and Peer-to-Peer (P2P) blockchain. A novel data-driven algorithm is designed for Aircraft Trajectory Prediction (ATP) based on Autoencoder architecture. The Autoencoder is used due to its excellent fault-tolerant ability when input data provided by the GPS is deficient. After conflict detection, P2P Blockchain is utilized for securely decentralized decision-making. The meta-controller composed of the Autoencoder and P2P blockchain performed the ATMC task very well. The validation studies were done relying on a comprehensive database of trajectories constructed using our UAS-S4 Ehécatl. The ATP accuracy was evaluated for a variety of data failures, and the performance index confirmed the Autoencoder’s excellent efficiency. Aircraft were considered in several local encounter scenarios, and their trajectories were securely managed and controlled using our designed Smart Contract developed on the Ethereum platform. Toward decentralized processing, the edge computing approach improved the P2P Blockchain performance in terms of computational complexity and processing time in real-time operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it