MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317639547 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050519

Systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of depression in older medical inpatients: a randomized trial

2005· article· en· W4317639547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreSt Mary's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineDepression (economics)Randomized controlled trialPopulationRating scaleHamdIntervention (counseling)PsychiatryFamily medicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineAnxietyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

M ajor depression occurs in 10%-30% of older med- ical inpatients 1-4 and appears to be associated with poor functional status, 5 increased use of hospital services 6,7 and reduced survival, 6,8-10 independent of the severity of physical illness. Despite the apparent benefits of treatment, 11 up to 90% of cases of depression are not detected by attending physicians during the course of usual hospital care, Because a strategy of systematic detection and treatment has been shown to benefit elderly people with depression living in the community, Our secondary objective was to determine the effect of the intervention on basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive status, side-effects profile, mortality and health services utilization (length of hospital stay, and number of readmissions and emergency department visits).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it