MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317650535 · doi:10.53550/eec.2022.v28i04.082

Physical-Chemical Properties and Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in Agriculture Soil in Al-Qadisiyah City by using ArcGIS and Multivariate Analysis

2022· article· en· W4317650535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maitham Mohammed Kazim, Safaa A. Kadhum

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology Environment and Conservation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental chemistryHeavy metalsPollutionSoil waterEnvironmental scienceSoil testAgriculturePollutantEnvironmental engineeringChemistrySoil scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al-Qadisiyah governorate is one of the most important agricultural areas in Iraq, and the study was conducted in different areas of the governorate, including seven areas for sampling. The physical-chemical properties and heavy metals of agricultural soils were examined. The results showed that highest value was Ni (189.9 mg/kg) followed by Cr (124.5 mg/kg), Zn (50.8 mg/kg), Cu (36.9 mg/kg), Pb (35.2 mg/kg) and Cd (1.17 mg/kg). Moreover, Ni and Cr concentration levels were higher than Canadian soil guidelines. Geostatistical analysis was applied to know the sources of heavy metals in agricultural soil and results were revealed that Zn, Cu, Ni, and Cr were the same pollution sources and Cd and Pb also were the same pollution sources indicating these elements impacted by anthropogenic activities. The Pearson correlation coefficients found some physical-chemical properties role in increasing heavy metals in the soil such as EC and Cu, and also TOC, OM and Cr. Therefore, these results are considered useful for the competent authorities in order to reduce and control these pollutants in agricultural soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology Environment and ConservationSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207