MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317660698 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100419

EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL STUDENT COUNSELING FOR HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS ADDICTED TO TOBACCO (MS-CHAT): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

2023· article· en· W4317660698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialFamily medicineIntervention (counseling)Smoking cessationCurriculumConfidence intervalPhysical therapyInternal medicineNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A. Khetan is a co-founder of SEHAT (Society to Enhance Health and Access to Treatments), Dalkhola, West Bengal, India. SEHAT provided funding for this study. Other authors have no relevant financial disclosures. ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors; Preventive Cardiology Best Practices The need for, and effectiveness of physician counseling for tobacco has been well emphasized. However, the medical curriculum in many countries offers very little training needed to offer effective behavioral counseling. We hypothesized that providing medical students with experiential training in tobacco cessation counseling will improve their knowledge, while providing a valuable resource to help patients quit. pandemic, the primary outcome was changed from a biochemically verified quit rate to self-reported 7-day point prevalence of smoking cessation at 6 months. Changes in medical student knowledge were assessed using a pre- and post-questionnaire delivered prior to and 12 months after training. Among 688 patients randomized across three medical schools, 343 were assigned to the intervention group and 345 to the control group. After 6 months of follow up, the primary outcome occurred in 188 patients (54.8%) in the intervention group, and 145 patients (42.0%) in the control group (absolute difference 12.8%; relative risk, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.26; p <0.001). Among 70 medical students who participated in the study, knowledge increased from a mean score of 14.8 (±0.8, maximum score of 25) at baseline to a score of 18.1 (±0.8) at 12 months, an absolute mean difference of 3.3 (95% CI, 2.3-4.3; p <0.001). This is an effective, low cost intervention that achieves the dual purpose of providing experiential training in behavioral counseling to future physicians, while simultaneously helping tobacco users quit. It is easily scalable and can be tailored to meet the needs of medical education and tobacco cessation programs in health systems across the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it