MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317675767 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100007332

PLEDS : corrélations cliniques

2007· article· en· W4317675767 on OpenAlexaffvenue
W. J. Fitzpatrick, N. Lowry

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyMedicineNeuroimagingPediatricsMigraineStroke (engine)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We reviewed our experience in 96 consecutive patients exhibiting periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs) on EEG. Methods: EEG reports from January 1, 1999 to September 30, 2006 were screened for the term ‘PLEDs’ and its variants. A retrospective chart review, including examination of neuroimaging and other investigations, was conducted on each patient identified. Results: Acute stroke, tumor and central nervous system infection were the most common etiologies, accounting for 26%, 12% and 12% of cases respectively. Acute hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury combined accounted for another 12%. Previously unreported etiologies included posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), familial hemiplegic migraine and cerebral amyloidosis. There were 9 cases of chronic PLEDs attributable to underlying cortical dysplasia or severe remote cerebral injury, all with an accompanying partial seizure disorder. A prominent role for alcohol withdrawal was noted, and in 6 cases was the sole etiological factor. Fever was present as a potential contributing factor in 40% of cases, and significant metabolic abnormalities in 35%. Seizure activity occurred in 85% of patients overall, but in 100% of patients with PLEDs Plus and BiPLEDs Plus. The overall mortality rate was 27%. Mortality among patients with BiPLEDs however was almost twice that, at 52%. Conclusions: This case series demonstrates the wide variety of potential PLED etiologies. It also emphasizes that despite advances in neurocritical care, the morbidity and mortality associated with PLEDs has changed little since their recognition four decades ago.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207