MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317677030 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2022-0137

Energy harvesting optimization using 2D car suspension system actuated by a sawtooth speed bump

2023· article· en· W4317677030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Min‐Chie Chiu, Mansour Karkoub, Ming-Guo Her

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSawtooth waveVibrationAutomotive engineeringElectromagnetic coilEnergy harvestingSuspension (topology)Control theory (sociology)Shock absorberEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringAcousticsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, an optimal suspension system is proposed to reduce the oscillations/vibrations of the car's body and harvest some of the induced vibration energy. The usual shock absorbers are replaced with energy harvesters capable of not only absorbing vibrations for ride comfort but also regenerating electrical energy for onboard use. To investigate the efficiency of the proposed harvesters, the input to the vehicle wheels is assumed to come from a sawtooth-shaped speed bump or rumble speed strip. Also, given the coupling between the various degrees of freedom of the car (heave, pitch, etc.), a half-car model is adopted in the derivation of the equations of motion. To maximize the amount of energy harvested, the design parameters of the harvesters are obtained using the simulated annealing optimization technique with four objective functions. Many of the design parameters, including magnet size, coil turns, and coil layers, are adjusted during the optimization process. Constant and accelerated motions are considered in this study to maximize the generated electricity index and ride comfort efficiency. The simulation results showed that the optimized harvesters were able to regenerate a significant amount of energy while maintaining an acceptable ride comfort level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207