Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (JOR) has been the prime journal in dentistry for publication of original scientific research articles and reviews in the field of temporomandibular disorders, orofacial pain, bruxism, dysfunctional mastication and swallowing, and related quality-of-life perspectives. Our new goal is to further expand the journal aims and scopes to also include research articles and reviews in the fields of physiotherapy and clinical and basic craniofacial neuroscience. We will accept original research papers and technical methods related to craniofacial neuroscience and also clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis or high-quality scoping reviews in the field of physical interventions for managing orofacial pain. Therefore, two new Associate Editors, Professor Cesar Fernandez de las Peñas (Madrid), and Associate Professor Limor Avivi-Arber (Toronto), have been appointed to facilitate this new development within physiotherapy and craniofacial neuroscience research, respectively. We are confident that this expansion will better serve authors, readers and the community, and contribute to the continuous growth of the JOR. If you have questions about article submission, do not hesitate to contact Cesar Fernandez de las Peñas, Limor Avivi-Arber or myself. Yours sincerely,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".