MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317702727 · doi:10.1353/tcc.2023.0004

Visualizing Folk Love Songs: De/politicization of Sinicized Cartoons in North China under Japanese Occupation

2023· article· en· W4317702727 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Muyang Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueTwentieth-Century China · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyMcGill University
KeywordsChinaIdeologyPoliticsScholarshipZhàngHistorySociologyLiteratureArtGender studiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the War of Resistance against Japan (1937-1945), cartoons constituted an important type of cultural production in Japanese-occupied China.Most scholarship focuses on the political stances shown in such cartoons.However, this article explores Chinese cartoons that seldom directly addressed political issues in wartime North China.In 1935, Zhang Guangyu created the first Folk Love Songs cartoon, which has been seen as representative of Sinicized cartoons, emphasizing the national characteristics shown in Chinese folk culture.With changes in formal and ideological matters, Folk Love Songs cartoons continued to appear in Japanese-occupied North China, featuring quotidian topics.This article argues that, by visualizing everyday life, Folk Love Songs cartoons displaced and de/politicized (depoliticized and simultaneously repoliticized) the national characteristics embedded in prewar Sinicized cartoons.The motif showcases the complexity of wartime cultural production that was not totally occupied by political propaganda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTwentieth-Century ChinaSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207