Dynamical Analysis and Synchronization of a New Memristive Chialvo Neuron Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chialvo is one of the two-dimensional map-based neural models. In this paper, a memristor is added to this model to consider the electromagnetic induction’s effects. The memristor is defined based on a hyperbolic tangent function. The dynamical variations are analyzed by obtaining the bifurcation diagrams and Lyapunov spectra. It is shown that the most effective parameters on the dynamics are the magnetic strength and the injected current. The memristive Chialvo can exhibit different neural behaviors. It is also proven that, like the primary Chialvo model, the memristive version has coexisting attractors; an oscillating state coexists with a fixed point. In addition, to understand how memristive neurons behave in a network, two memristive Chialvo models are coupled with electrochemical synapses. By connecting two neurons and calculating the synchronization error, we can determine the system’s synchronizability. It is indicated that the electrical coupling is essential for the occurrence of complete synchronization in the network of memristive Chialvo, and the sole chemical coupling does not lead to synchronization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it