Bidirectional dispersals during the peopling of the North American Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is thought that Paleo-Inuit were the first people that settled the American Arctic about 5000 BP (before the present) from a migration that crossed Beringia from Northeast Asia. It is theorized that this group initially migrated to the North Slopes of Alaska and subsequently expanded eastward, eventually reaching Greenland. A second circumpolar dispersal of Neo-Inuit from the North Slopes associated with the Thule-Inuk culture has been postulated to have extended eastward around 800 BP, totally replacing the original Paleo-Inuit without admixing. Although generally accepted, this migration scenario is incompatible with previously reported indications of east to west gene flow across the American Arctic. Here we report on the Y-chromosome haplogroup and Y-STR diversity of the four circumpolar populations of the Tuva Republic (N = 24), Northeast Siberia (N = 9), Bethel, Alaska (N = 40), and Barrow, Alaska (N = 31). Four haplogroup lineages (Q-NWT01, Q-M3, Q-M346, and Q-M120) were detected, Q-NWT01 and Q-M3 being the most abundant at 11.11 and 66.67% in Northeast Siberia, 32.50 and 65.00% in Bethel, and 67.74 and 32.26% in Barrow, respectively. The same samples genotyped for Y-chromosome SNPs were typed for 17 Y-STYR loci using the AmpFlSTR Yfiler system. Age estimates and diversity values for the Q-NWT01 and Q-M3 mutations suggest extensive movement of male individuals along the entire longitudinal stretch of the American circumpolar region. Throughout the entire region, Q-M3 exhibits a west to east decreasing gradient in age and diversity while Q-NWT01 indicates the opposite with older TMRCA and higher diversity values running from east to west with the most recent estimates in Canada and Alaska. The high age and diversity values in Greenland are congruent with an origin of the Q-NWT01 mutation in the east of the circumpolar range about 2000-3000 ya. This scenario is incompatible with a complete biological replacement starting about 700 BP of Paleo-Inuit like the Dorset by the Thule-Inuit (Neo-Inuit), as is currently thought, and more parsimonious with gene flow carrying the NWT01 mutation from a pre-Thule population to the ancestors of the present-day Inuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".