Bibliographic record
Abstract
The young history of Quebec society bears witness to the rapid pace of transformations brought about by the conditions for the inscription of an ancient culture on a new continent.Quebec society, now American, is detached from the European models that historically and linguistically gave it birth.What interests us in this vast context is a reflection on the position and role of the poet, novelist, teacher, and essayist Louise Dupré who transcends Quebec borders.Indeed, her book Higher than the flames, written one year after the visit to the former extermination camps of Auschwitz and Birkenau, leads to the reconstruction and rebirth of humanity.Our goal is to identify the writing techniques which make possible to achieve that through the following stages: by the declines, the decadence of humanity which caused the death of the lost children in the camps, by the reconstruction and rebirth of humanity linked to our mission to "find ladders higher than the flames" 1 in order to relearn to dance, to live.Because "life is not just hell" (PHQLF, p. 25).Therefore, this book is not only a book about pain, but also a book about love and hope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".