MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation Model of a Multi-Hospital Critical Care Network

2022· article· en· W4317792658 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexander R. Rutherford, Samantha L. Zimmerman, Mina Moeini, Rashid Barket, Steve Ahkioon, Donald Griesdale

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive careMedicineCritical care nursingDiscrete event simulationMedical emergencyComputer scienceEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineSimulationHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a discrete event simulation model for a network of eight major intensive care units (ICUs) in British Columbia, Canada. The model also contains high acuity units (HAUs) that provide critical care to patients that cannot be cared for in a general medical ward, but do not require the full spectrum of care available in an ICU. We model patient flow within the ICU and HAU for each of the hospitals, as well as patient transfers to address ICU capacity. Included in the model is early discharge from ICU to HAU, sometimes called “bumping”, when the ICU is full, as well as ICU overflow beds. The simulation model, which is calibrated using the British Columbia Critical Care Database, will be used to support planning for critical care capacity under endemic and seasonal COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)Same topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207