MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317802063 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106025

Single-cell pair-wise relationships untangled by composite embedding model

2023· article· en· W4317802063 on OpenAlex
Sishir Subedi, Yongjin Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaProvincial Health Services Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticellular organismComputational biologyGeneCellBiologyEmbeddingRNAScalabilityComputer scienceGeneticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multicellular organisms, cell identity and functions are primed and refined through interactions with other surrounding cells. Here, we propose a scalable machine learning method, termed SPRUCE, which is designed to systematically ascertain common cell-cell communication patterns embedded in single-cell RNA-seq data. We applied our approach to investigate tumor microenvironments consolidating multiple breast cancer datasets and found seven frequently observed interaction signatures and underlying gene-gene interaction networks. Our results implicate that a part of tumor heterogeneity, especially within the same subtype, is better understood by differential interaction patterns rather than the static expression of known marker genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it