Peter Bogner and Gerd Zillner, eds. Frederick Kiesler: Face to Face with the Avant-Garde: Essays on Network and Impact. Basel: Birkhauser, 2019. 360 pp. 151 b/w illus. $76.14 (hardcover) ISBN 978-3035615500
Bibliographic record
Abstract
advocated for the necessity of radical changes in our built environment.He had a multifaceted personality and was a prominent name in the theatre scene, the art world, and in architecture.His profound knowledge of and close association with numerous avant-garde circles gave him a unique position among his peers.It is this understudied aspect of his work that Face to Face with the Avant-Garde explores.In twentyone essays, a wide range of scholars, art and architecture historians, and curators investigate artists, exhibitions, and movements that he was closely associated with both in Europe and the United States.Meticulously researched, mostly drawn from personal diaries and correspondence, the essays reveal the surprisingly vast array of Kiesler's social networks, attributing contemporary terminology such as "networker" or "influencer" to his social position.While Kiesler's interior designs for galleries are often considered his most
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".