MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4317830045 · doi:10.1002/acr.25090

Assessing the Costs of Neuropsychiatric Disease in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Cohort Using Multistate Modeling

2023· article· en· W4317830045 on OpenAlexafffund
Ann E. Clarke, John G. Hanly, Murray B. Urowitz, Yvan St. Pierre, Caroline Gordon, Sang‐Cheol Bae, Juanita Romero‐Díaz, Jorge Sánchez‐Guerrero, Sasha Bernatsky, Daniel J. Wallace, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Joan T. Merrill, Paul R. Fortin, Dafna D. Gladman, Ian N Bruce, Michelle Petri, Ellen M. Ginzler, Mary Anne Dooley, Rosalind Ramsey‐Goldman, Susan Manzi, Andreas Jönsen, Graciela S. Alarcón, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Guillermo Ruiz‐Irastorza, S. Sam Lim, Murat İnanç, Kenneth Kalunian, Søren Jacobsen, Christine Peschken, Diane L. Kamen, Anca Askanase, Vernon T. Farewell

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Care & Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversité LavalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManitobaToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesVersus ArthritisNational Research Foundation of KoreaEusko JaurlaritzaNational Research FoundationUniversity College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLupus Research AllianceSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS TrustNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesWellcome TrustUniversity of CalgaryGigtforeningenMcGill UniversityArthritis SocietyJohns Hopkins UniversityManchester Biomedical Research CentreUniversité Laval
KeywordsCohortMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusSystemic lupusDiseaseCohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To estimate direct and indirect costs associated with neuropsychiatric (NP) events in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort. METHODS: NP events were documented annually using American College of Rheumatology definitions for NP events and attributed to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or non-SLE causes. Patients were stratified into 1 of 3 NP states (no, resolved, or new/ongoing NP event). Change in NP status was characterized by interstate transition rates using multistate modeling. Annual direct costs and indirect costs were based on health care use and impaired productivity over the preceding year. Annual costs associated with NP states and NP events were calculated by averaging all observations in each state and adjusted through random-effects regressions. Five- and 10-year costs for NP states were predicted by multiplying adjusted annual costs per state by expected state duration, forecasted using multistate modeling. RESULTS: A total of 1,697 patients (49% White race/ethnicity) were followed for a mean of 9.6 years. NP events (n = 1,971) occurred in 956 patients, 32% attributed to SLE. For SLE and non-SLE NP events, predicted annual, 5-, and 10-year direct costs and indirect costs were higher in new/ongoing versus no events. Direct costs were 1.5-fold higher and indirect costs 1.3-fold higher in new/ongoing versus no events. Indirect costs exceeded direct costs 3.0 to 5.2 fold. Among frequent SLE NP events, new/ongoing seizure disorder and cerebrovascular disease accounted for the largest increases in annual direct costs. For non-SLE NP events, new/ongoing polyneuropathy accounted for the largest increase in annual direct costs, and new/ongoing headache and mood disorder for the largest increases in indirect costs. CONCLUSION: Patients with new/ongoing SLE or non-SLE NP events incurred higher direct and indirect costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Care & Research→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→