MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317892067 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/acb5c3

Fully Printed pH Sensor based on Polyaniline/Graphite Nanocomposites

2023· article· en· W4317892067 on OpenAlexafffund
Shirin Mahinnezhad, Ricardo Izquierdo, Andy Y. Shih

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolyanilineGraphiteMaterials scienceNanocompositePotentiometric titrationElectrodePotentiometric sensorElectrochemical gas sensorChemical engineeringPolyaniline nanofibersConductive polymerElectrochemistryComposite materialPolymerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, there is an exceptional growth in research related to the development of flexible sensors for health analysis. pH measurements can be done non-invasively and continuously, making it an excellent parameter for monitoring different stages of wound healing. Here, we report pH functionality of a polyaniline/graphite (PANI/G) composite in a fully-printed potentiometric pH sensor and the effect of graphite loading on sensor functionality. PANI/G composites in different ratios were aerosol-jet printed on Ag/AgCl with and without a graphite layer as the working electrode in a two-electrode potentiometric sensor on a flexible substrate. The role of graphite layer on working electrode in functionality of the sensor has been investigated. The PANI/G composites were prepared by a solution processing method using a graphite paste and polyaniline emeraldine salt powder. Samples were characterized by XRD, SEM, and FTIR analysis to investigate the relations between the physical and chemical relations and the performance of the sensors. The sensors were tested in the pH range from 3 to 10, exhibiting a linear, stable and near-Nernstian sensitivity of 53 mV pH −1 and a response time of 15 s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207